We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.

Opening History's “Black Boxes”: Decoding the Disciplinary Unconscious of Historians

From Decoding the Disciplines
Revision as of 20:00, 10 October 2026 by Riegler (talk | contribs) (initialize page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abstract

More than two decades have passed since Lee Shulman called for educational researchers to move beyond generic studies of teaching to create “pedagogical content knowledge” that explores the ways that students learn in particular academic fields (Shulman, 1986). As the present volume amply illustrates, the intervening period has seen at least the beginnings of a sustained and systematic reevaluation of the intersection of the content and the practice of disciplines with student learning. Dai Hounsell and Charles Anderson’s work on “Ways of Thinking and Practicing in Biology and History” (Chapter 6) provides an excellent example of the progress that has been made in this area, and it can also serve as the occasion for a consideration of how these insights can be integrated with the actual practice of instructors within the disciplines.

Bibliographic data

Pace, D. (2010). Opening History’s “Black Boxes”: Decoding the Disciplinary Unconscious of Historians. In The University and its Disciplines (pp. 120-128). Routledge.

External source

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203892596-19/reactive-opening-history-black-boxes-decoding-disciplinary-unconscious-historians-david-pace