We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.

Bottlenecks: From Static Words to Slippery Concepts

From Decoding the Disciplines
Revision as of 15:07, 23 April 2025 by Riegler (talk | contribs) (+init)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abstract

This article argues that: (a) Teaching astelling-that funda-mentally undervalues the abstractive nature of learning,and fails to empower students to construct their own ab-stractions. (b) Abstractions are contextualised stories aboutdiscovering-how. (c) Contextualised stories are commu-nicated more faithfully throughconstruction activities. (d)Learning conversations use teaching bottlenecks to refineour understanding of our domain of expertise, and to de-sign construction activities for teaching.

Bibliographic data

Riegler, Peter (2020). The Decoding Interview — An Exemplary Insight. Didaktik-Nachrichten (Jul. 2020), pp. 29-45.

External source

https://d-nb.info/1342433254/34

See also

German translation: Bottlenecks: Zwischen glitschigen Konzepten und starren Worten‏‎

Retrieved from "https://testing.decodingthedisciplines.de/index.php?title=Bottlenecks:_From_Static_Words_to_Slippery_Concepts&oldid=3128"