We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.

Teaching the history threshold learning outcomes to first-year students

From Decoding the Disciplines
Revision as of 18:46, 16 December 2024 by Riegler (talk | contribs) (init)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abstract[edit | edit source]

Stakeholder ownership and implementation are crucial when applying the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) to the development of curriculum. Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs) are a case in point. While they might seem to be triumphs of managerialism over pedagogy, we argue that they can be used to build lecturers’ deep engagement with the teaching of their discipline and thus foster sustainable change. By extending the professional use of TLOs , beyond the stages of agreement, establishment and early dissemination, to the point of implementation , we offer a framework for how to elicit collegial conversations to improve teaching and learning practice in history. First, we combine ‘Decoding the Disciplines ’ methods developed by historians at Indiana University. Second, we add key principles of first-year pedagogy , associated with Sally Kift . Third, we link to Threshold Learning Outcomes . The framework is supplemented by a good practice guide that translates our theoretical model into practical strategies in teaching and assessment.

Bibliographic data[edit | edit source]

Clark, J., Jones, A., Thomas, T., Allen, P., Cole, B., Lawrence, J., Sheridan Burns, L. & Wallace, J. (2018). Teaching the history threshold learning outcomes to first-year students. Teaching the Discipline of History in an Age of Standards, 59-87.

External source[edit | edit source]

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-0047-9_4