Reframing Information Literacy as Academic Cultural Capital: A Critical and Equity-Based Foundation for Practice, Assessment, and Scholarship: Difference between revisions
init |
Changed categories. |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/17822/19663 | https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/17822/19663 | ||
[[Category:PublishedWork]] | [[Category:PublishedWork]] | ||
[[Category:Article]] | |||
[[Category:Library and Information Science]] | |||
[[Category:2019]] | |||
[[Category:Folk, A L]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:56, 10 October 2026
Abstract[edit | edit source]
Within the past decade, academic librarianship has increased its focus on criticallibrarianship and assessing student success, as well as undergoing a complete recon-ceptualization of information literacy. However, our assessment and scholarship re-lated to information literacy and student success largely neglects the persistent racialand social-class achievement gaps in American higher education. This article drawsupon a critical social theory commonly used in higher education research—culturalcapital—to consider the ways in which information literacy as threshold conceptsmay enable or constrain success for students whose identities higher education hastraditionally marginalized. Finally, Estela Mara Bensimon’s equity cognitive frame isintroduced to consider the ways in which we can ground our practice, assessment,and scholarship in our professional values of equity and inclusion.
Bibliographic data[edit | edit source]
Reframing Information Literacy as Academic Cultural Capital: A Critical and Equity-Based Foundation for Practice, Assessment, and Scholarship
External source[edit | edit source]
https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/17822/19663