We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.

Threshold Concepts in Literary Studies: Difference between revisions

From Decoding the Disciplines
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Riegler (talk | contribs)
init
 
Riegler (talk | contribs)
Changed categories.
 
Line 6: Line 6:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213061.pdf
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213061.pdf
[[Category:PublishedWork]]
[[Category:PublishedWork]]
[[Category:Article]]
[[Category:Threshold concept]]
[[Category:2019]]
[[Category:Corrigan, P T]]

Latest revision as of 18:44, 16 December 2024

Abstract[edit | edit source]

This essay proposes a series of "threshold concepts" for literary studies: "text", "meaning", "context", "form", and "reading". Each term carries both commonsense understandings and disciplinary understandings, which differ from each other drastically. The disciplinary understandings entail far "more" than the commonsense ones. Unless such differences are named and explained clearly, unacknowledged commonsense understandings may hinder students' ability to learn equally unacknowledged disciplinary understandings. The naming and describing of such contrasting sets of understandings and of the differences between them is an act of disciplinary introspection-a scholarly and pedagogical act vital for understanding and teaching any complex body of knowledge. In addition to proposing threshold concepts for literary studies specifically, then, this essay encourages and offers a model for teacher scholars in any discipline.

Bibliographic data[edit | edit source]

Corrigan, P. T. (2019). Threshold Concepts in Literary Studies. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(1), 3-17.

External source[edit | edit source]

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213061.pdf