The database is currently locked! Reason provided by the system administrator: Major Server Maintenance, Access wil be restored soon.

We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.

Decoding the Disciplines: An Approach to Scientific Thinking: Difference between revisions

From Decoding the Disciplines
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Riegler (talk | contribs)
Created page with "==Abstract== The Decoding the Disciplines methodology aims to teach students to think like experts in discipline-specific tasks. The central aspect of the methodology is to id..."
 
Riegler (talk | contribs)
Changed categories.
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716637484
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716637484
[[Category:PublishedWork]]
[[Category:PublishedWork]]
[[Category:Article]]
[[Category:2016]]
[[Category:Pinnow, E]]
[[Category:Psychology]]

Latest revision as of 18:38, 5 December 2024

Abstract[edit source]

The Decoding the Disciplines methodology aims to teach students to think like experts in discipline-specific tasks. The central aspect of the methodology is to identify a bottleneck in the course content: a particular topic that a substantial number of students struggle to master. The current study compared the efficacy of standard lecture and readings (Control) to the Decoding the Disciplines methodology in teaching Introductory Psychology students about the scientific process. Relative to the Control group (N = 45), students taught using the Decoding the Disciplines methodology (N = 46) created better hypotheses and operational definitions and correctly identified more variables. These results suggest that using the Decoding the Discipline methodology may facilitate student learning about scientific inquiry.

Bibliographic data[edit source]

Pinnow, E. (2016). Decoding the Disciplines: An Approach to Scientific Thinking. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15(1), 94-101.

External source[edit source]

https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716637484