We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.
Editing
Threshold Concepts: Informing the Curriculum
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Abstract== Threshold concepts are defined by Meyer and Land (2003) as those concepts that are held to be central to the mastery of a discipline; students must grasp these concepts before they can move forward significantly. When a threshold concept is grasped, that is, when understanding is robust, the learner will see, know and behave quite differently within their discipline. To put this work in context, the idea that there are likely to be threshold concepts in all subject areas grew out of a national research project entitled ‘Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses’(ETL) carried out in the UK between 2001 and 2005. The project sought to develop subject-specific conceptual frameworks that would influence the quality of student learning. There was a focus on developing not only generic ways of thinking and practising, but also disciplinary skills, and a focus on concepts and ways of thinking that students find difficult, particularly when they act as thresholds to further learning. During the past decade, the idea of threshold concepts has led to significant debate that has captured the interest of an ever-growing international community of teachers in higher education. In our experience, it has challenged and drawn in teachers who were not previously engaging in faculty development opportunities in their institutions. The reason for this may lie in the fact that the identification of threshold concepts, and the implications for curriculum design, place the disciplinary experts centre stage. This chapter will highlight certain common characteristics of threshold concepts and demonstrate how we can use these to inform curriculum design. It looks at what the student must do, and what we as teachers must do, to succeed. The chapter will examine in-depth one case study, which monitors students’ journeys as they are transformed by the grasping of a threshold concept. ==Bibliographic data== Higgs, B., & Cronin, J. (2013). Threshold concepts: Informing the curriculum. ''Emerging Issues in Higher Education III: From capacity building to sustainability'', 161-177. ==External source== https://www.edin.ie/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ei3-ch12.pdf [[Category:PublishedWork]] [[Category:Higgs, B]] [[Category:Teacher training]] [[Category:Article]] [[Category:2013]] [[Category:Cronin, J]] [[Category:Threshold concept]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Decoding the Disciplines may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Decoding the Disciplines:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Edit together
Search
Navigation
Main page
About this wiki
Decoding the Disciplines
Events
Contribute
Pages needed
People
Scholarly Work
Literature
By Discipline
By Author
Collection of Bottlenecks
See also
Decoding Webpage
Youtube
Podcast
Blog: Decoding the Ivory Tower
Decoding list serve
ISSOTL SIG
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information