We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.
Editing
Moving beyond the threshold: A TLRI final report 2014–16
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Abstract== Moving beyond the threshold set out to interrogate what it means to think historically in the digital age (Tredinnick, 2013). How do university students and teachers use digital media to transform learning experiences? Do digital approaches present novel ways to engage with key historical concepts? Answers to these questions continue to be important and urgent; large-scale investment in educational resources and technology is based on the assumption that current and future students are or will become digitally literate, and that they know how to use digital media effectively and efficiently in inquiry-led and autonomous learning. There is little evidence to prove, however, that the so-called ‘net generation’(Schulmeister, 2015; Tapscott, 1998) grasp the disciplinary threshold concepts of historical thinking, attain successful learning outcomes through technology-mediated teaching, or achieve the key competencies of critical and creative thinking and citizenship that prepare them for future employment and social engagement. Teachers of history-informed subjects need robust research data and evidence of effective practices to understand and advance the relationship between digital technologies, curriculum planning, and historical thinking in order to effectively integrate digital literacies into the curriculum and to accurately evaluate their impact on student learning. Such evidence can be used to inform public policy about future funding strategies for digital learning practices at universities, and address gaps in students’ access to resources by demographic, subject matter, ethnicity, and gender. This Teaching and Learning Research Initiative (TLRI) final report tells the story of how a project that combined threshold concepts, historical thinking, and digital technology became, in the process, an investigation into academic identity and the ontological challenges of what Vaughan et al.(2015) have termed ‘threshold experiences’. ==Bibliographic data== Shep, S. J. (2017). ''Moving Beyond the Threshold: A TLRI Final Report 2014-16''. Teaching & Learning Research Initiative ==External source== http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/Final%20formatted%20report%20-%20Shep%28v1%29.pdf [[Category:PublishedWork]] [[Category:Faculty learning community]] [[Category:2017]] [[Category:Book]] [[Category:Shep, S J]] [[Category:Threshold concept]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Decoding the Disciplines may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Decoding the Disciplines:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Edit together
Search
Navigation
Main page
About this wiki
Decoding the Disciplines
Events
Contribute
Pages needed
People
Scholarly Work
Literature
By Discipline
By Author
Collection of Bottlenecks
See also
Decoding Webpage
Youtube
Podcast
Blog: Decoding the Ivory Tower
Decoding list serve
ISSOTL SIG
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information