We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.
Editing
Decoding The Disciplines For Postgraduate Law Students
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Abstract== Particular ways of thinking characterise each discipline but too often they remain implicit in our teaching and this impedes student learning. 'Decoding the Disciplines', which emerged from the Indiana University Faculty Learning Community in 2004, is a deceptively simple framework that enables lecturers to understand why many students have difficulty in their discipline. In this paper I consider the ways I employed the framework while teaching three different modules to postgraduate law students, in order to break down the fuzzy concept of 'critical thinking' so essential to postgraduate work. Too often, even at undergraduate level, the focus is on mastering disciplinary content through repetition of lecture notes and required reading, and students do not always progress beyond the 'expositional mode'. By using the 'decoding the disciplines' framework lecturers can uncover strategies that enable students to critically engage with texts and so achieve the enhanced understanding required of postgraduates. This paper focuses particularly on my work with students studying the Legal Research and Methods module. There is a symmetry between the philosophy of 'decoding the disciplines' and the goals of the Legal Research and Methods module. This is a threshold module designed to bridge the divide between undergraduate and postgraduate study, to provide students with a deeper understanding of their discipline, and the skills they need to undertake their first significant piece of independent research. The techniques associated with 'decoding the disciplines' have been developed because the cognitive repertoire required of students differs greatly not only between disciplines, but also between undergraduate and postgraduate study. This paper analyses the ways in which the seven-step framework provided by 'decoding the disciplines' guides lecturers as they develop strategies to enable students to master the process of learning required of them as postgraduate law students. ==Bibliographic data== Somers, Caroline. “Decoding The Disciplines For Postgraduate Law Students.” ''AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education'' 6.2 (2014). [[Category:PublishedWork]] [[Category:Somers,C]] [[Category:2014]] [[Category:Law]] [[Category:Article]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Decoding the Disciplines may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Decoding the Disciplines:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Edit together
Search
Navigation
Main page
About this wiki
Decoding the Disciplines
Events
Contribute
Pages needed
People
Scholarly Work
Literature
By Discipline
By Author
Collection of Bottlenecks
See also
Decoding Webpage
Youtube
Podcast
Blog: Decoding the Ivory Tower
Decoding list serve
ISSOTL SIG
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information