We are doing major maintenance work during the last week of October. Expect the wiki be unavailable for some time.
Editing
Threshold concept
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Relation to Decoding the Disciplines == Threshold Concepts and [[Step 1 - Identify a Bottleneck to Learning|Step 1 Identify bottlenecks]] of ''Decoding the Disciplines'' both use theories of difficulty (Perkins, 2007) and focus on the hurdles of content. They both foreground the aspects of learning that prove consistently troublesome to uncover the tacit or “secret knowledge” of the discipline. Theories of difficulty design the challenge, but do not solve them. The main way the two theories differ is that ''Decoding the Disciplines'' from the start had a second theoretical component. Decoding Steps [[Step 3 - Modeling Mental Operations|3]]-[[Step 4: Give Students Practice and Feedback|4]]-[[Step 5 - Motivate and lessen resistance|5]]-[[Step 6 - Assess Student Mastery|6]] navigate the problem using pedagogical theory. These Steps organize teaching and learning processes for good results, scaffolding instructional techniques to foster learning (Perkins, 2007). “The great strength of decoding is the methodology that undergirds the theory…,” (p. 41, Shopkow & Middendorf, 2019). In categorial terms every threshold concept is a bottleneck while not every bottleneck is a threshold concept. Shopkow <ref>Shopkow, Leah (2010). “[[What ‘Decoding the Disciplines’ has to offer ‘Threshold Concepts]],’” in Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning, ed. Jan H. F. Meyer, Ray Land, & Catherine Baillie (Rotterdam: Sense Publications), 317-32.</ref>. Threshold concepts are the paradigm-shifting kinds of bottlenecks (Middendorf, 2025). Shopkow, L., & Middendorf, J. (2019). CAUTION! THEORIES AT PLAY! Threshold concepts and Decoding the Disciplines. In J.A Timmermans & R. Land (Eds.) ''Threshold concepts on the edge.'' Leiden: Brill/Sense, pp. 37-50. Middendorf, J (2025 in press). The Theory Bottleneck and Decoding the Disciplines. Die Hoschudt Perkins, D. (2007). Theories of difficulty. In N. Entwistle, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), ''Student learning and university teaching'' (pp. 31–48). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Decoding the Disciplines may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Decoding the Disciplines:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Edit together
Search
Navigation
Main page
About this wiki
Decoding the Disciplines
Events
Contribute
Pages needed
People
Scholarly Work
Literature
By Discipline
By Author
Collection of Bottlenecks
See also
Decoding Webpage
Youtube
Podcast
Blog: Decoding the Ivory Tower
Decoding list serve
ISSOTL SIG
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information